OPEN BOUQUET (January-February)

By William Markiewicz

(As other short items may follow, I've decided to group them together.)

"Spreading fear in the name of righteousness" (2/26)

-- the words used by Jean Luc Picard at the end of a "Star Trek" episode I saw this evening. I turned on the TV too late to see the title but what's important is how well it defines the way the NWO rules today.

Hague Hearings on Disputed Wall (2/25)

Peace negotiations + military conquest + permanent civilian conquest, secured with a barrier -- how can this mixture lead to anything but war? Is conquest more important than peace?

Departure of "Judge-Prosecutor" (2/23)

"Judge-Prosecutor" May, through his arrogance and lust for power, contributed to unmasking the circus of the International Court of the Hague. He went overboard and his departure may be a small step toward justice.

Purity, Security -- the DDT Mentality (2/20)

In the name of security, the strong one conquers the weaker with total impunity because who could determine his reasons and check his agenda. He has on his side the silent majority of gullible or cynical citizens. He always has the last word; when all is quiet, he'll take credit for his "policy of vigilance." If there's trouble, he'll say: "I told you they're dangerous!" His victims are the masses on both sides, the defeated as well as the winners, because the dominant nation will be marked by its excesses, like bloated cartoon caricatures. They will not escape being degraded to a level to pampered juvenile hoodlums who can vandalise anything as long as they themselves feel adequately protected. I've read in some newsgroups the opinions of control freaks who want the planet to be cleansed of any dangers, eliminating predatory animals, dangerous lifeforms, while protecting the rest from illness and degeneration through vigilant selection. How would you like to live in a such a Brave New World? Discreetly it has started again with the NW O, after those who wanted to improve soul and flesh, from the Inquisition to racial cleansing. Now the NWO Security freaks and Jihad's soul saviours fight on Jihad lands for the bone of oil.

Milosevic's Trial vs Zundel's Trial (2/12)

Here's my contribution to the Jurist Forum which is mainly devoted to discussion of the Milosevic Trial at the Hague. Some participants paralled Ernst Zundel's trial with Milosevic's. This is my response.

-- In my 'Vagabond Pages' under the title "How Many Jews ..." I came to a conclusion totally opposite the one advocated by Mr. Zundel. However, I don't sustain that Holocaust denial should be considered a crime, even if, in my opinion, Mr. Zundel doesn't act in good faith. In my opinion, lies concerning History shouldn't be a topic for criminal investigation but is the domain of the universities (to avoid suspicion of political manipulation). Let's judge History through evidence and logic, not through the courts.

Mr. Zundel cannot deny that Nazism killed the Jews, he cannot deny the genocide, through he denies the Holocaust's scope. In the Milosevic trial, all who stand for Milosevic deny that genocide happened, especially because the testimonies of secret witnesses replace evidence.

In cases linked to Nazism, we have all seen the pictures of mountains of corpses. Nobody denied their authenticity, the wagons of hairs, dentures, crutches, ashes, ashes, ashes, which had to belong to somebody. Most of the pictures came from Nazi sources or from reports practically simultaneous with the Allies' entrance. The battlefields were still smoldering; there was no time for fabrication. If the mass killing was not carried out through gas chambers, does Mr. Zundel offer another efficient alternative? Himmler declared (I quote from memory): "The Final Solution is our most glorious achievement which has to remain forever a secret." Mr. Zundel remains obedient to Himmler's order.

Kurds and Women's Rights (2/08)

Kurdish parliament defies Baghdad
Legislators won't recognize proposed Shiite-backed family law,
seen as setback for women
(Excerpts from www.thestar.com, February 5th, 2004 ):

<...> 
In December, under the rotating presidency of Shiite 
cleric Abdel-Aziz al-Hakim, the council voted to abolish
the law regulating marriage, divorce, child custody and
inheritance, instead allowing different religious groups
to apply their own traditions. 

The Kurdish parliament said in a statement it was 
sticking to a family law passed in 1959 and the amendments
that the Kurdish administrations have introduced to it. 
<...>
Under the secular Baath party of Saddam Hussein, Iraqi
women enjoyed more rights - in education, the workplace
and marital status - than those in many other Arab
countries. Kurdish women, living under their own
regional governments since 1991, have campaigned
against the Governing Council decision. 
<...>

Women's organizations throughout the world should support the Kurds's efforts before it is too late.

Crossroad of 20th to 21st Century = Crossroad of Reigning Death (1/30)

Holocaust, WW2, "law and order" in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, WMDs (which are OK if in the hands of the stronger), genetic engineering and artificial insemination (genetic dead-ends?), Aids, Mad Cow Disease, Bird and Mammal Flu -- never in history did Moloch receive such generous offerings. Which species will die first from cleansing/extermination -- the contaminated pariahs or the Purifiers?

The U.S. Puts a Jockey on the Iraqi Camel (1/10)

The Iraqi Council is irritated because it was not consulted on the U.S. decision to declare Saddam a POW. Why this irritation? The U.S. took Saddam prisoner; does the Iraqi Council consider itself a U.S. partner in this war?

The U.S., playing its role of benevolent occupier, seems open to the Iraqi Council's requirements and announced that this decision is not final. Turning Saddam over to judgement in Iraq will be to throw Saddam at the mercy of his Shiite enemies, virtually putting the Sunni minority under Shiite domination. This will definitely kill the secular character and women's equality particular to Saddam's Iraq. The Sunnis will surely resist. An unending civil war remains in perspective as one more flower in the bouquet of the NWO.

France in the Axis of Evil (1/02)

Hawks tell Bush how to win war on terror
(Excerpt from telegraph.co.uk, 31/12/2003):

President George W Bush was sent a public manifesto yesterday
by Washington's hawks, demanding regime change in Syria and
Iran and a Cuba-style military blockade of North Korea backed
by planning for a pre-emptive strike on its nuclear sites.

The manifesto, presented as a "manual for victory" in the war
on terror, also calls for Saudi Arabia and France to be treated
not as allies but as rivals and possibly enemies.

The manifesto is contained in a new book by Richard Perle,
a Pentagon adviser and "intellectual guru" of the hardline
neo-conservative movement, and David Frum, a former Bush
speechwriter. They give warning of a faltering of the "will
to win" in Washington.

The Renaissance was born centuries ago in Europe and humanized us. Who could have guessed that it would die in our time, strangled between the Puritans and the Ayatollahs?

Back to the index of the Vagabond

William Markiewicz